The Rational Male – Religion by Rollo Tomassi

Author:Rollo Tomassi [Tomassi, Rollo]
Language: eng
Format: epub, pdf
Published: 2021-01-02T23:00:00+00:00

It’s easy to dismiss the influence of the feminine on what is re-evolving into a new feminine-world order of spirituality, but it would be foolish dismiss the influences of the Feminine Imperative – the Goddess Movement – that is manifesting incrementally in the power vacuum left by men’s abdication of masculine moral authority to the feminine. We read that Millennials may not be “as religious” as previous generations, but that doesn’t mean they don’t seek out ‘spiritual, but not religious’ metaphysical connections. They seek direction, and connection in religion, but they seek it in the secular, gynocentric terms they’ve been conditioned to believe they should define themselves by. A similar parallel exists on the masculine side too. Recall that one of the reasons for Dr. Jordan Peterson’s popularity was his ‘ministering’ to a generation of “lost boys” seeking direction in life. He is every bit one of the Lords of the New Church in the same way that the Goddess Movement speaks to another demographic of lost souls who seek absolution in the “divine feminine” – also a term Peterson is fond of.

What then does a religion by women, for women look like? Maybe more importantly, what does that religion look like on a globalized scale? What does the Goddess look like? To outline this we’ll need to return to the Alpha God template that Dr. Hector Garcia proposed in the last chapter. Male Gods look like men and behave according to human male (and primates) imperatives. As mentioned, that usually includes reserved sexual access, reproductive power, tribal obedience to an Alpha male headship, territorial acquisition, violence, etc. What serves an evolved masculine imperative is what serves God. He is always the referential for God. The same dominance and competence hierarchies, and Burden of Performance that naturally evolved among men in our ancestral past were reflected in our impression of what a God we could relate with looked like. Whether God made man in His image, or man required a metaphor for a God that looked like him, the point is man and God are reflections of the other. God made man in his own image. It follows that our best interests on this planet would be His best interests for men.

Human females, however, have a much different existential experience on this planet than men. While men were the hunters and warriors, women were the gatherers and nurturers. When you read about feminist angst over gender inequality and division of labor most of what we think of as traditional gender roles find its basis in evolutionary necessity, not social constructionism. It made pragmatic sense that the vulnerable incubators of the next generation would evolve innate proclivities that put them into different roles. Women tend to have an innately greater degree of empathy (if not sympathy) than do men. Neurologically, women process emotions differently than men and they interpret and respond differently to emotional cues. Women innately have a greater facility with communication than men. While men prioritize content (information) in conversation, women prioritize context (feelings).

Download

Copyright Disclaimer:
This site does not store any files on its server. We only index and link to content provided by other sites. Please contact the content providers to delete copyright contents if any and email us, we'll remove relevant links or contents immediately.