James IV by Norman Macdougall;

Author:Norman Macdougall;
Language: eng
Format: epub
Publisher: Casemate Publishers & Book Distributors, LLC

NOTES

1. T.A., i, cliv–clv; 345–350.

2. Ibid., i, 312–3.

3. Cal. State Papers (Spain), i, No. 210.

4. E.R., x, xi, xii, xiii, passim.

5. Charles A. Kelham, ‘Bases of Magnatial Power in Later Fifteenth-Century Scotland’: unpublished Ph.D. thesis, Edinburgh 1986, 337–8.

6. E.R., xi, preface, xxix-xxx.

7. Ibid., xi, preface, xxviii; 364–384, passim.

8. A.P.S., ii, 219, 224, 230, 233–4.

9. T.A., i, 215, 312, 315.

10. Ibid., i, 312–3.

11. E.R., xi, 49; R.S.S., i, 405.

12. Supplementary Register House Charters, cited in A.L. Murray, ‘Exchequer and Crown Revenue, 1437–1542’, unpublished Ph.D. thesis, Edinburgh, 1961, Appendix, 85–6.

13. Cal. Docs. Scot., iv, No. 1660.

14. Ibid., iv, No. 1670.

15. Ibid., iv, Nos. 1675, 1676.

16. Ibid., iv, No. 1680.

17. Cal. State Papers (Spain), i, No. 210.

18. S.R.O. 1/2: Sir John Skene, ‘Tabill and repertour of the Cheker rollis’, 104.

19. T.A., ii, 196.

20. James IV Letters, No. 37; and see below, Chapter 9.

21. T.A., iv, 351.

22. Ibid., iv, 360–365.

23. Ibid., iv, 391–396.

24. Aberdeen Council Register, 85.

25. For the details of Ross’s elevation to the archbishopric, see Leslie J. Macfarlane, ‘The Primacy of the Scottish Church, 1472–1521’, in Innes Review, xx (1969), 111–129, at 119–21; and the same author’s Elphinstone, 313–4. On assuming control of the archbishopric, Ross retained only the principal messuage of each of his secular possessions: Herkless and Hannay, Archbishops of St. Andrews, i, 213–4.

26. T.A., i, 383, 388, 389.

27. Ibid., i, 316.

28. E.R., xi, 78–9, 161–3, 191, 296. Other confirmations following on King James’s 1498 revocation are in Ibid., xi, 81, 165–9, 171–2, 176, 184, and 301–2.

29. See above, Chapter 4.

30. Fraser, Douglas, iii, Nos. 133, 147. For a full discussion of Angus’s political manoeuvres during his Chancellorship, see M.G. Kelley, ‘The Douglas Earls of Angus: A Study in the Social and Political Bases of Power of a Scottish Family from 1389 until 1557’: Edinburgh Ph.D. thesis, 1973, pp. 107–111, 223–4.

31. Cal. Docs. Scot., iv, No. 1635; R.M.S., ii, No. 2370.

32. R.M.S., ii, Nos. 2374, 2382.

33. For details, see A.D.A., 196–7.

34. S.R.O., A.D.C., xix, f. 131. I am indebted to Steve Boardman, who is working on Scottish politics and the feud for a Ph.D. thesis, for much information on the Kilmaurs-Montgomery feud.

35. Fraser, Eglinton, ii, No. 65.

36. E.R., x, 185; T.A., ii, 113.

37. S.R.O. Eglinton collection, GD 3/1/116; Fraser, Eglinton, ii, 54–6.

38. R.S.S., i, No. 215; S.R.O. Eglinton collection, GD 3/1/120.

39. R.S.S., i, No. 360.

40. S.R.O. Eglinton collection, GD 3/10/2028 (temporary number): Document dated 7 February 1499.

41. S.R.O. Glencairn Muniments, GD 39/1/24.

42. R.S.S., i, No. 360.

43. A.D.C., ii, 233.

44. A.P.S., ii, 230 c.2.

45. Cal. Docs. Scot., iv, No. 1680.

46. Cal. State Papers (Spain), i, Nos. 249, 268.

47. By the terms of the marriage alliance of 1474, James III was to receive a dowry of 20,000 marks sterling — about £40,000 Scots — for the marriage of his son and heir (James IV) to Edward IV’s daughter Cecilia: Cal. Docs. Scot., iv, No. 1437. The dowries of James V were 100,000 livres — about £45,000 Scots — for the king’s first wife Madeleine, daughter of Francis I of France; and 150,000

Download

Copyright Disclaimer:
This site does not store any files on its server. We only index and link to content provided by other sites. Please contact the content providers to delete copyright contents if any and email us, we'll remove relevant links or contents immediately.