Gynecologic Radiation Therapy by Akila N. N. Viswanathan Christian Kirisits Beth E. E. Erickson & Richard Pötter

Gynecologic Radiation Therapy by Akila N. N. Viswanathan Christian Kirisits Beth E. E. Erickson & Richard Pötter

Author:Akila N. N. Viswanathan, Christian Kirisits, Beth E. E. Erickson & Richard Pötter
Language: eng
Format: epub
Publisher: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg


12.2.5 Applicator Reconstruction Using MR Images

Localizing the source path from MR images is challenging because conventional markers used for X-ray and CT cannot be used in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Special MR markers like catheters containing a fluid CuSO4 solution [11], water [12], or glycerin [13] can be used in plastic applicators (Fig. 12.2), although the signal from these MR markers can be faint in T2-weighted images when using applicators with narrow entrance diameters. In titanium applicators, fluid contrast cannot be visualized inside the source guide tubes due to susceptibility artifacts. Slice thickness is an important parameter for reconstruction, since it has direct impact on the precision of reconstruction. It is recommended to perform reconstruction in image series obtained with a slice thickness less than or equal to 5 mm. Furthermore, para-transverse imaging visualizes the applicator better than with transverse imaging. 3D sequences with isotropic voxel sizes produce an excellent visualization of the applicator, and it is also possible to do contouring in certain T2-weighted 3D sequences [14]. Performing contouring and reconstruction in the same image series is an advantage when possible, because this eliminates uncertainties introduced by registering different image series. Moreover, it avoids uncertainties due to the artifact shifts that change with pulse sequence [15]. In many cases, an artifact is indicating the location of the applicator while the true applicator position is not directly visible. When using metallic applicators in particular, care should be taken to verify the geometric relationship between the true applicator position and the artifacts from the applicator.

Fig. 12.2Transversal and coronal (reconstructed) magnetic resonance (MR) images with a plastic tandem–ring applicator in situ. Thin catheters containing a CuSO4 solution in water have been inserted into tandem and ring channels, and appear as bright contrast in the signal void of the applicator material



Download



Copyright Disclaimer:
This site does not store any files on its server. We only index and link to content provided by other sites. Please contact the content providers to delete copyright contents if any and email us, we'll remove relevant links or contents immediately.