The First Epistle to the Corinthians, Revised Edition by Gordon D. Fee

Author:Gordon D. Fee
Language: eng
Format: epub
Publisher: Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing Co.
Published: 2014-01-15T00:00:00+00:00

ADDENDUM

During the decades following the first edition of this commentary, considerable debate (unrest?) arose in some portions of the evangelical community regarding male/female (usually in the form of “husband/wife”) relationships in the home. Much of it had to do with the meaning of Paul’s use of kephalē (“head”) in this passage. Since it is not the goal of the present commentary to enter into this debate, but simply to expound the text as best one can on the basis of the available information, I here (as elsewhere; see the introduction to chaps. 8–10) simply append the bibliography that has appeared in the scholarly journals, and again have done so in their chronological order of appearance (in this case including those that also predated the first edition of the commentary):

W. O. Walker, “1 Corinthians 11:2–16 and Paul’s View regarding Women in 1 Cor. 11:2–16,” JBL 94 (1975), 94–110; J. Murphy-O’Connor, “The Non-Pauline Character of 1 Corinthians 11:2–16?” JBL 95 (1976), 615–21; L. Cope, “1 Cor. 11:2–16: One Step Further,” JBL 97 (1978), 435–36; G. W. Trompf, “On Attitudes toward Women in Paul and Paulinist Literature: 1 Corinthians 11:3–16 and Its Context,” CBQ 42 (1980), 196–215; P. W. Fiddes, “ ‘Woman’s Head Is Man’: A Doctrinal Reflection upon a Pauline Text,” Baptist Quarterly (London), 31 (1986), 370–83; D. K. Lowery, “The Head Covering and the Lord’s Supper in 1 Corinthians 11:2–34,” BibSac 143 (1986), 155–63; A. Padgett, “ ‘Authority over Her Head’: Toward a Feminist Reading of St. Paul,” Daughters of Sarah 12 (1986), 5–9; T. P. Shoemaker, “Unveiling of Equality: 1 Corinthians 11:2–16,” BTB 17 (1987), 60–63; H. W. House, “A Biblical View of Women in the Ministry (Part 2 of 5): Should a Woman Prophesy or Preach before Men?” BibSac 145 (1988), 141–61; J. Murphy-O’Connor, “1 Corinthians 11:2–16 Once Again,” CBQ 50 (1988), 265–74; R. Oster, “When Men Wore Veils to Worship: The Historical Context of 1 Corinthians 11.4,” NTS 34 (1988), 481–505; H. van de Sandt, “1 Kor. 11, 2–16 als een retorische eenheid [1 Cor. 11, 2–16 as a rhetorical unit],” Bijdragen 49 (1988), 410–25; C. L. Thompson, “Hairstyles, Head-Coverings, and St. Paul: Portraits from Roman Corinth,” BA 51 (1988), 99–115; D. Ellul, “ ‘Sois belle et tais-toi!’ Est-ce vraiment ce que Paul a dit? A propos de I Cor. 11, 2–16,” Foi et Vie 88 (1989), 49–58; J. A. Fitzmyer, “Another Look at ΚΕΦΑΛΗ in 1 Corinthians 11.3,” NTS 35 (1989), 503–11; W. O. Walker, “The Vocabulary of 1 Corinthians 11.3–16: Pauline or Non-Pauline?” JSNT 35 (1989), 75–88; D. W. J. Gill, “The Importance of Roman Portraiture for Head-Covering in 1 Corinthians 11.2–16,” TynB 41 (1990), 245–60; G. P. Corrington, “The ‘Headless Woman’: Paul and the Language of the Body in 1 Cor 11.2–16, PRS 18 (1991), 223–31; K. T. Wilson, “Should Women Wear Headcoverings?” BibSac 148 (1991), 442–62; J. A. Fitzmyer, “Kephalē in I Corinthians 11.3,” Int 47 (1993), 52–59; L. A. Jervis, “ ‘But I Want You to Know …’: Paul’s Midrashic Intertextual Response to the Corinthian Worshipers (1 Cor 11.

Download

Copyright Disclaimer:
This site does not store any files on its server. We only index and link to content provided by other sites. Please contact the content providers to delete copyright contents if any and email us, we'll remove relevant links or contents immediately.