UFO Crash Retrievals - Status Report I: Retrievals of the Third Kind by Leonard Stringfield

Author:Leonard Stringfield [Stringfield, Leonard]
Language: eng
Format: azw3
Publisher: New Saucerian
Published: 2016-06-01T16:00:00+00:00

Comment

No one can blame Carl for upholding his sworn oath to secrecy, but a slip of his tongue with his loved one had let the proverbial cat out of the bag. I believe that the information recounted by his wife is fairly accurate. Of special interest in this incident of retrieval is the year 1973, which suggests that the corpses of alien occupants recovered from crashed UFOs are still being sent to Wright-Patterson AFB for analysis and preservation.

Abstract XVII: New light on the “Scully case“

We come now to one case which I believe deserves both climactic treatment, and a reappraisal of all its known facts, for it concerns the first alleged retrieval of craft and crew on record and its far-reaching impact on research.

The case in point is the controversial Aztec, New Mexico, incident of February, 1948, which was sensationalized by Frank Scully in his book, Behind The Flying Saucers. This one case, as cited before,† has prejudiced serious researchers. Most are still soured by it, and as a result, shun or discredit all retrieval stories.

While Scully used shady characters to support his case, new data supported by people with solid credentials, has since surfaced through the efforts of Professor Robert Spenser Carr, a long-time researcher with his own proper credentials.

Now retired, Professor Carr, who formerly taught mass communications at South Florida University, and served as Director of Research at Walt Disney Stutlios, made national news in 1975 when he reopened the “Aztec Pandora’s Box” during a press interview in Tampa. When asked by a cub reporter to substantiate his claims that he believed UFOs were from outer space, Carr responded briefly using data he had amassed on the “little men” recovered in Aztec. When the story punched its way through the wire services, researchers were caught off guard, including myself. Like others questioned by the press, I responded with scepticism. At that time I had no new data on the Aztec case. In fact, I had not corresponded with Professor Carr since the 1950s, when I published the Crifo Orbit. Checking my old files, I reviewed his letters sent to me. Certainly all were well-written, factual and conservative.

On March 28, 1978, while visiting my daughter and her husband in Dade City, Florida, I telephoned Professor Carr in nearby Clearwater. After rehashing our UFO struggles in the 50s, I asked him about his collected data on retrievals, and specifically about the Aztec incident. His response was rewarding. He had accumulated more data about Aztec than I had ever anticipated. I called him again on March 31st and asked for his permission to use certain of his data in this paper. Again Carr was obliging, except for a reluctance to use the names of his sources. Commented Professor Carr: “I have spent 17 years collecting the data I have on the Aztec case. I know of other retrievals, but my main thrust through all those years was concentrating on sources who knew about the Aztec incident. I could write a book about that one retrieval alone.

Download

Copyright Disclaimer:
This site does not store any files on its server. We only index and link to content provided by other sites. Please contact the content providers to delete copyright contents if any and email us, we'll remove relevant links or contents immediately.