Charity and Its Fruits (Jonathan Edwards Collection) by Jonathan Edwards

Author:Jonathan Edwards [Edwards, Jonathan]
Language: eng
Format: mobi
Tags: Religion & Spirituality
Publisher: Prisbrary Publishing
Published: 2012-09-06T04:00:00+00:00

THE SPIRIT OF CHARITY IS THE OPPOSITE OF A CENSORIOUS SPIRIT

“Charity...thinketh no evil”—1 Corinthians 13:5

Having remarked how charity, or Christian love, is opposed not only to pride and selfishness, but to the ordinary fruits of these evil dispositions, viz. an angry spirit and a censorious spirit, and having already spoken as to the former, I come now to the latter. And in respect to this, the apostle declares, that charity “thinketh no evil.” The doctrine set forth in these words is clearly this: that the spirit of charity, or Christian love, is the opposite of a censorious spirit; or, in other words, it is contrary to a disposition to think or judge uncharitably of others.

Charity, in one of the common uses of the expression, signifies a disposition to think the best of others that the case will allow. This, however, as I have shown before, is not the Scriptural meaning of the word charity, but only one way of its exercise, or one of its many and rich fruits. Charity is of vastly larger extent than this. It signifies, as we have already seen, the same as Christian or divine love, and so is the same as the Christian spirit.

In accordance with this view, we here find the spirit of charitable judging mentioned among many other good fruits of charity, and here expressed, as the other fruits of charity are in the context, negatively, or by denying the contrary fruit, viz. censoriousness, or a disposition uncharitably to judge or censure others.

In speaking to this point, I would, first, show the nature of censoriousness, or wherein it consists; and then mention some things wherein it appears to be contrary to a Christian spirit. I would show,

I. The Nature of Censoriousness

The nature of a censorious spirit, a disposition uncharitably to judge others, consists in a disposition to think evil of others, or to judge evil of them, with respect to three things: their state, their qualities, their actions.

1. A forwardness to judge evil of the state of others.

It often shows itself in a disposition to think the worst of those about us, whether they are men of the world or professing Christians. In respect to the latter class, it often leads persons to pass censure on those who are professors of religion, and to condemn them as being hypocrites. Here, however, extremes are to be avoided. Some persons are very apt to be positive, from little things that they observe in others, in determining that they are godly men; and others are forward, from just as little things, to be positive in condemning others as not having the least degree of grace in their hearts, and as being strangers to vital and experimental religion. But all positiveness in an affair of this nature seems to be without warrant from the Word of God. God seems there to have reserved the positive determination of men’s state to Himself, as a thing to be kept in His own hands, as the great and only searcher of the hearts of the children of men.

Download

Copyright Disclaimer:
This site does not store any files on its server. We only index and link to content provided by other sites. Please contact the content providers to delete copyright contents if any and email us, we'll remove relevant links or contents immediately.