Until the End of Time: Mind, Matter, and Our Search for Meaning in an Evolving Universe by Brian Greene

Author:Brian Greene [Greene, Brian]
Language: eng
Format: epub
ISBN: 9780241295991
Google: _4GQDwAAQBAJ
Amazon: 0525432175
Barnesnoble: 0525432175
Publisher: Knopf Doubleday Publishing Group
Published: 2020-02-18T00:00:00+00:00

Belief, Confidence, and Value

Almost to a person, those who inquire about my belief in God invoke “belief” in the very same way they would if asking about my belief in quantum mechanics. In fact, I’m often asked the two questions in tandem. I tend to phrase my response in terms of confidence—a measure of certainty—noting that my confidence in quantum mechanics is high, because the theory accurately predicts features of the world, such as the electron’s magnetic dipole moment, with a precision beyond the ninth decimal place, while my confidence in the existence of God is low because of the paucity of rigorous supporting data. Confidence, as these examples illustrate, emerges from dispassionate, essentially algorithmic judgment of evidence.

Indeed, when physicists analyze data and announce a result, they quantify their confidence using well-established mathematical procedures. The word “discovery” is generally used only when the confidence crosses a mathematical threshold: the probability of being misled by a statistical fluke in the data must be less than about one in 3.5 million (an arbitrary-looking number but one that naturally emerges in statistical analyses). Of course, even such high levels of confidence do not ensure that a “discovery” is true. Data from subsequent experiments may require us to adjust our confidence; in this case, too, mathematics provides an algorithm for calculating the update.

While few of us live by such mathematical methods, we arrive at many of our beliefs through similar if less overtly analytical reasoning. We see Jack with Jill, and wonder if they might be a couple; we see them together again and again, and our confidence in that conclusion grows. Later, we learn that Jack and Jill are siblings, and so we discount our previous assessment. And on it goes. It is an iterative process that you might anticipate converging on beliefs that reflect the true nature of the world. But that need not be the case. Evolution did not configure our brain processes to form beliefs that align with reality. It configured them to favor beliefs that generate survival-promoting behaviors. And the two considerations need not coincide. If our forebears had carefully investigated every swish and rustle that caught their attention, they would have found that most could be explained without invoking a volitional agent. But from the standpoint of adaptive fitness, their burdensome investment in seeking the truth would have had little going for it. Across tens of thousands of generations, our brains eschewed greater accuracy for a rough-and-ready understanding. Nimble responses often beat considered assessments. Verity is an important character in the drama of belief but is easily upstaged by survival and reproduction.

Thickening the plot further, evolution added another cast member: emotions. In 1872, more than a dozen years after announcing evolution by natural selection, Darwin published The Expression of the Emotions in Man and Animals, exploring his conviction that the biologically adapted brain, not culture, is the primary driver of emotional expression. Drawing on close observations of his children, widely disseminated questionnaires, and cross-cultural data he

Download

Copyright Disclaimer:
This site does not store any files on its server. We only index and link to content provided by other sites. Please contact the content providers to delete copyright contents if any and email us, we'll remove relevant links or contents immediately.