Doing It! - Going Beyond the Sexual Revolution (John Warren Wells on Sexual Behavior Book 13) by Block Lawrence & Wells as John Warren

Author:Block, Lawrence & Wells, as John Warren [Block, Lawrence]
Language: eng
Format: azw3
Publisher: Lawrence Block
Published: 2012-08-07T04:00:00+00:00

As I said earlier, I doubt it would be a simple task to marshal sufficient data concerning semen ingestion and the health of the prostate gland. But if any other readers have contributions on the subject, I would be glad to hear about it. As to the effect of ingestion of female secretions, I have no idea of their possible nutritional composition. Does anyone out there have a thought or two on the matter?

The relative merits of shaved or unshaved pubic hair is a matter of some controversy, although one rarely reads of public debates on the subject. I’m familiar with the argument that men who prefer hairless women are unconsciously seeking prepubescent girls as partners. This may hold true in certain cases but strikes me as a rather sweeping generalization. In quite a few cultures, women routinely remove all body hair, the pubic hair included; the removal of such hair is considered a component of femininity. In other cultures all female body hair is retained. Our own falls between the two extremes; hair in the armpit or upon the upper lip is usually removed, legs are usually shaven, and pubic hair is generally retained.

One wonders just how many women do remove pubic hair, and how many men would prefer their doing so. One wonders, too, to what extent sexual attitudes on this question may derive less from experience than from the conditioning effect of magazine retouching. Photographs of unclad ladies have long been retouched, with airbrushes removing pubic hair. (At one stage, a popular magazine used to give the same treatment to nipples, with unfortunate results; there is something indescribably alien about the mere idea of a breast without a nipple.)

In the case of Miss Mitchell, retouching seems to be in evidence. I have never met the lady and thus have had no opportunity for more concrete research.

Another point Duncan raises concerns the composition of threesomes and the superiority of two men and one woman as opposed to two women and a man. It has been my observation that the combination of two women and a man is more widely sought, occurs more frequently, and is more apt to lead to a long-term alliance. In a book of mine, Three Is Not A Crowd, I studied four long-term threesomes, all of the two females and the one male variety. As far as sexual capacity is concerned, there’s no question but that women are physically capable of performing sex many more times per day than are men; a woman does not require the physical manifestation of an erection in order to perform. In most trios this fact is balanced off by female bisexuality, and also by the fact that few long-standing sexual alliances push sexual relations to the limits of human endurance anyhow.

At the same time, though, I’ve noted in swinger publications an increase of couples desiring single men as trio partners. Read into this whatever implications you wish.

• • •

How do you score with a stewardess? Everybody seems to

Download

Copyright Disclaimer:
This site does not store any files on its server. We only index and link to content provided by other sites. Please contact the content providers to delete copyright contents if any and email us, we'll remove relevant links or contents immediately.