Pseudopandemic; New Normal Technocracy by Iain Davis

Author:Iain Davis [Davis, Iain]
Language: eng
Format: epub
Published: 2021-06-23T07:00:00+00:00

15 - Sustainable Eugenics

Another unquestioned scientific consensus is that man made global warming (anthropogenic climate change - AGW) is leading us all towards global disaster. Like the pseudopandemic, this is based upon predictive computer models, not the scientific observation of measurable events. Overpopulation is a climate alarm threat, but only according to the models.

Therefore, if the people promoting global sustainable development have a proven history of a commitment to eugenics and population control, perhaps we should question this claimed scientific consensus. If, in addition, sustainable development goals also strengthen their authority and enable those same people to achieve other stated goals we have further grounds for scepticism.

Sustainable Development Goals, to save the planet, also just happen to require the Climate Bonds Initiative [1] (CBI). This is intended to be a $100 + trillion bond market to invest in protecting the global commons. Until very recently worldwide interests rates have been extremely low [2] and yet, at the same time, the CBI is offering between an 8% – 12% yield for venture capitalist stakeholders.

The idea of commodifying nature was first formally proposed by then chairman of Banque Privée Edmond de Rothschild at the 4th World Wilderness Conference [3] in 1987. This introduced the Rothschild backed Bank the Global Environment Facility [4] (GEF – named in 1991) initially as a subsidiary, and then later as a partner of the World Bank. Announcing his idea, Edmund de Rothschild said:

“The concept of an international conservation banking program involves all sectors of the human community. Governmental and intergovernmental agencies, the public and private agencies, large charitable foundations, as well as ordinary individuals worldwide. By thinking forward as to how to reach out to the public at large, to every corporate entity throughout the world, to put aside, hopefully tax free, a part of their profits to fund our ecological and environmental protection. This international conservation bank must know no frontiers, no boundaries.”

This was a clarion call to the GPPP to set about the creation a new global economic system. One where investment was measured in terms of its ecological and environmental value. The stakeholder capitalists at the meeting recognised the need to sell this idea to the public. Another delegate, Montreal banker David Lang, suggested the following approach:

“I suggest therefore that this be sold, not through a democratic process, that would take too long and devour far too much of the funds to educate the cannon fodder, unfortunately, that populates the earth. We have to take almost an elitist program, [so] that we can see beyond our swollen bellies, and look to the future in time frames and in results which are not easily understood, or which can be, with intellectual honesty, be reduced down to some kind of simplistic definition.”

Despite the fact that Mr Lang couldn’t form a coherent statement, his elite intellect enabled him to appreciate the eugenicist sentiments of those gathered. The cannon fodder’s (human beings’) existence was unfortunate. David Rockefeller, undoubtedly in full agreement with Lang, was also present at the conference.

Download

Copyright Disclaimer:
This site does not store any files on its server. We only index and link to content provided by other sites. Please contact the content providers to delete copyright contents if any and email us, we'll remove relevant links or contents immediately.