Negotiating Culture by La Follette Laetitia;

Negotiating Culture by La Follette Laetitia;

Author:La Follette, Laetitia;
Language: eng
Format: epub
Publisher: University of Massachusetts Press
Published: 2013-08-14T16:00:00+00:00


NOTES

1. Letter of August 12, 2005, www.mapuche.info/mapu/ctt050812.html.

2. The quotation is from Nora Marks Dauenhauer and Richard Dauenhauer, “Technical, Emotional and Ideological Issues in Reversing Language Shift: Examples from Southeast Alaska,” in Endangered Languages: Language Loss and Community Response, ed. Lenore Grenoble and Lindsay Whaley (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998), 60.

3. For one study that particularly addresses issues of ownership, see Judith Maxwell, “Ownership of Indigenous Languages: A Case Study from Guatemala,” in Indigenous Intellectual Property Rights: Legal Obstacles and Innovative Solutions, ed. Mary Riley (Walnut Creek, CA: AltaMira, 2004), 173–217.

4. Michael Krauss, “The World’s Languages in Crisis,” Language 68.1 (1992): 4–10; Leanne Hinton, “Language Revitalization: An Overview,” in The Green Book of Language Revitalization in Practice, ed. Leanne Hinton and Kenneth Hale (New York: Academic Press, 2001), 5; UNESCO Ad Hoc Expert Group on Endangered Languages, “Language Vitality and Endangerment,” document submitted to the International Expert Meeting on UNESCO Programme: Safeguarding of Endangered Languages, Paris, March 10–12, 2003, available at www.unesco.org/culture/ich/doc/src/00120-EN.pdf; Jane Hill, “‘Expert Rhetorics’ in Advocacy for Endangered Languages: Who Is Listening, and What Do They Hear?,” Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 12.2 (2002): 119–33.

5. I. Wayan Arka, “Local Autonomy, Local Capacity Building and Support for Minority Languages: Field Experiences from Indonesia,” in Documenting and Revitalizing Austronesian Languages, ed. D. Victoria Rau and Margaret Florey (Honolulu: University of Hawai‘i Press, 2007), 66.

6. ASEDA (Aboriginal Studies Electronic Data Archive) FAQ, www1.aiatsis.gov.au/ASEDA/faq.html; Geoff Pullum, blog post on Language Log, November 24, 2006, http://itre.cis.upenn.edu/~myl/languagelog/archives/003820.html.

7. Keren Rice, “Must There Be Two Solitudes? Language Activists and Linguists Working Together,” in Indigenous Language Revitalization: Encouragement, Guidance and Lessons Learned, ed. Jon Reyhner and Louise Lockard (Flagstaff: Northern Arizona University College of Education, 2009), 37–60, quotations on 41. For an excellent exploration of these issues within the Northern Athabaskan community of Kaska speakers in the Yukon, see Barbara A. Meek, We Are Our Language: An Ethnography of Language Revitalization in a Northern Athabaskan Community (Tucson: University of Arizona Press, 2010).

8. Jane Simpson, “Sovereignty over Languages and Land,” posted on Transient Languages & Cultures, November 25, 2006, http://blogs.usyd.edu.au/elac/2006/11/sovereignty_over_languages_and_1.html.

9. Raquel-Maria Yamada, “Collaborative Linguistic Fieldwork: Practical Application of the Empowerment Model,” Language Documentation and Conservation 1.2 (2007): 258.

10. The first quotation is from Elena Benedicto, “Participative Research: The Role of the Linguist in the Development of Local Researchers,” unpublished manuscript, Purdue University, 2008; the second and third are from Lise Dobrin, “From Linguistic Elicitation to Eliciting the Linguist: Lessons in Community Empowerment from Melanesia,” Language 84.2 (2008): 307 (quoting linguist Geoff Smith). See also, among others, Deborah Cameron et al., Researching Language: Issues of Power and Method (London: Routledge, 1992); Deborah Cameron et al., “Ethics, Advocacy and Empowerment in Researching Language,” in Sociolinguistics: A Reader and Coursebook, ed. Nikolas Coupland and Adam Jaworski (London: Macmillan, 1997), 145–62; Eva Czaykowska-Higgins, “Research Models in Linguistics: Reflections on Working with Canadian Indigenous Communities,” unpublished manuscript, University of British Columbia, 2007; Collette Grinevald, “Language Endangerment in South America: A Programmatic Approach,” in Grenoble and Whaley, Endangered Languages, 124–59; Marianne Mithun, “Who Shapes the Record: The Speaker and the Linguist,” in Linguistic Fieldwork, ed.



Download



Copyright Disclaimer:
This site does not store any files on its server. We only index and link to content provided by other sites. Please contact the content providers to delete copyright contents if any and email us, we'll remove relevant links or contents immediately.