Cultural Evolution: How Darwinian Theory Can Explain Human Culture and Synthesize the Social Sciences by Alex Mesoudi

Author:Alex Mesoudi [Mesoudi, Alex]
Language: eng
Format: epub, pdf
Tags: Non-Fiction, Evolution, Science, 21st Century, Anthropology, v.5, Amazon.com, Retail, Cultural Anthropology
ISBN: 9780226520452
Google: EI4cr2DZlzAC
Amazon: 0226520447
Barnesnoble: 0226520447
Goodreads: 12633085
Publisher: University of Chicago Press
Published: 2011-07-29T15:00:00+00:00

Objections to Cultural Evolutionary Analyses of History

It is important to recognize that the research described in this chapter and the previous one is in the most part entirely compatible with traditional, nonevolutionary research in the social sciences and humanities. Indeed, in many cases social scientists have come up with informal methods, such as the linguists’ comparative method or the manuscript scholars’ stemmata, that are implicitly based on the same logic and assumptions as those that evolutionary biologists work with. And many of the findings obtained using evolutionary methods match well with what traditional scholars have already found, such as the broad topology of the Indo-European language family, the link between patriliny and cattle, or the likely identity of the oldest Canterbury Tales manuscript.

However, the real value of biologically derived phylogenetic methods and dynamical models lies in their rigor. Whereas linguists and manuscript scholars build their historical trees based on intuition, biologists and cultural phylogeneticists use quantitative statistical methods such as maximum likelihood or Bayesian inference to generate trees using explicit and exact criteria and with a known degree of statistical certainty. While cultural anthropologists draw comparisons across societies in order to explain systematic patterns of cultural variation (at least until social constructionism made cross-cultural comparisons unpopular), these comparisons are vulnerable to Galton’s problem unless phylogenetic methods are used to distinguish between similarities due to descent and similarities due to independent convergence. And while historians propose informal theories to explain historical trends, such as Collins’s geopolitical theory of empire decline, such theories can only be adequately tested using quantitative, population-based evolutionary models, which showed this particular theory to be incapable of explaining actual historical dynamics.

Despite the value of evolutionary methods, and the potential complementarity with existing social science research, I suspect that the majority of archaeologists, anthropologists, linguists, and historians will remain skeptical of such methods. Two common objections are that culture is too complex to be analyzed using simple evolutionary models, and that specific cultural phenomena (e.g., languages, empires) cannot be meaningfully compared with one another.

Download

Copyright Disclaimer:
This site does not store any files on its server. We only index and link to content provided by other sites. Please contact the content providers to delete copyright contents if any and email us, we'll remove relevant links or contents immediately.