Cracking the GMAT with 2 Computer-Adaptive Practice Tests, 2019 Edition by Princeton Review

Author:Princeton Review
Language: eng
Format: epub
Publisher: Random House Children's Books
Published: 2018-07-02T16:00:00+00:00

The first part of this answer looks good, because the first bolded clause does state the author’s conclusion. However, the second bolded clause supports the conclusion; it does not introduce unrelated information. Choice (A) only partially matches the argument’s structure, so eliminate it.

The first bolded clause provides background information, and the second offers evidence to contradict that information.

Part of the first bolded clause states that Company K relies heavily on consultants, which does resemble background information. However, nothing in the second bolded clause contradicts that information. Choice (B) is a partial match. Eliminate it.

The first bolded clause states one of the author’s premises, while the second states the author’s conclusion.

Download

Copyright Disclaimer:
This site does not store any files on its server. We only index and link to content provided by other sites. Please contact the content providers to delete copyright contents if any and email us, we'll remove relevant links or contents immediately.