Antibiotic Resistance in the Environment by Unknown

Antibiotic Resistance in the Environment by Unknown

Author:Unknown
Language: eng
Format: epub
ISBN: 9783030550653
Publisher: Springer International Publishing


4.3.2 UV Irradiation

Ultraviolet (UV) disinfection is an alternative to chlorine since it does not produce toxic disinfection by-products, prompting many WWTPs to switch from chlorine to UV, or applying chlorine and UV in combination. UV radiation damages bacterial cells by targeting the DNA molecule, which may result in inhibition of replication and a subsequent decrease in proliferation [109]. In drinking water disinfection processes, energy-rich UV-C light with wavelengths of 200–260 nm has been successfully used to inactivate microorganisms for decades [96, 110, 111]. However, the application of UV disinfection is limited in turbid wastewater, because high levels of suspended particles significantly decrease the efficiency of the UV radiation. In addition, microorganisms can possess several mechanisms such as photoreactivation, base excision repair (BER), nucleotide excision repair (NER), and mismatch repair (MMR) to ensure cell survival after UV-light treatment [112]. DNA damage also can be tolerated by bacteria to a certain extent by use of DNA repair mechanisms [113]. Additionally, double-strand break repair (by homologous recombination and nonhomologous end joining), SOS response, cell-cycle checkpoints, and programmed cell death (apoptosis) are also operative in various organisms with the expense of specific gene products [112].

As a disinfectant, UV irradiation inactivates most microorganisms and achieves reduction from 1 to 6 logs (Table 4). Relatively high inactivation efficiencies (3.4–4.2 logs) were observed for total bacteria as well as ARB in swine wastewater at fluence of 220 mJ/cm2 [114]. The results confirmed that UV light can penetrate UV-transparent structures into the cell and is primarily absorbed by the nucleobases comprising DNA and RNA [115]. However, very low ARG removal efficiencies (0.36–0.60-log of sul1, tetX, tetG, intI1) were observed at UV fluence of 249.5 mJ/cm2 [93]. Higher eARG (3–4 logs) removal efficiencies could be achieved, compared to that of iARGs, at the UV dosage of 400 mJ/cm2, indicating that UV was limited in its potential to damage iARGs [110]. Although bacteria can be inactivated, DNA may be still present in the treated water, which can be helpful for the regrowth of the surviving cells and may contribute to the spread of antibiotic resistance [95, 96, 116]. In order to improve the disinfection performance for real wastewater, H2O2 has been incorporated with UV radiation to generate highly reactive free OH• to damage the bacterial cell structure by increasing the oxidation potential and degrading the intracellular DNA after 90 min treatment [117].



Download



Copyright Disclaimer:
This site does not store any files on its server. We only index and link to content provided by other sites. Please contact the content providers to delete copyright contents if any and email us, we'll remove relevant links or contents immediately.