ISO IEC 17020 Complete Self-Assessment Guide by Blokdyk Gerardus

Author:Blokdyk, Gerardus [Blokdyk, Gerardus]
Language: eng
Format: epub
Publisher: Emereo Publishing
Published: 2018-05-02T16:00:00+00:00

CRITERION #5: IMPROVE:

INTENT: Develop a practical solution. Innovate, establish and test the solution and to measure the results.

In my belief, the answer to this question is clearly defined:

5 Strongly Agree

4 Agree

3 Neutral

2 Disagree

1 Strongly Disagree

1. For decision problems, how do you develop a decision statement?

<--- Score

2. How will you measure the results?

<--- Score

3. How can we improve ISO IEC 17020?

<--- Score

4. What actually has to improve and by how much?

<--- Score

5. Risk events: what are the things that could go wrong?

<--- Score

6. How do we decide how much to remunerate an employee?

<--- Score

7. How will you know when its improved?

<--- Score

8. Do we get business results?

<--- Score

9. How do you use other indicators, such as workforce retention, absenteeism, grievances, safety, and productivity, to assess and improve workforce engagement?

<--- Score

10. How will the team or the process owner(s) monitor the implementation plan to see that it is working as intended?

<--- Score

11. How to Improve?

<--- Score

12. How Do We Link Measurement and Risk?

<--- Score

13. What actually has to improve and by how much?

<--- Score

14. What to do with the results or outcomes of measurements?

<--- Score

15. Do you understand what can accelerate change?

<--- Score

16. What should a proof of concept or pilot accomplish?

<--- Score

17. Are improved process (‘should be’) maps modified based on pilot data and analysis?

<--- Score

18. How do you improve your likelihood of success ?

<--- Score

19. For estimation problems, how do you develop an estimation statement?

<--- Score

20. Was a pilot designed for the proposed solution(s)?

<--- Score

21. What needs improvement?

<--- Score

22. Are there any constraints (technical, political, cultural, or otherwise) that would inhibit certain solutions?

<--- Score

23. What evaluation strategy is needed and what needs to be done to assure its implementation and use?

<--- Score

24. Are new and improved process (‘should be’) maps developed?

<--- Score

25. What error proofing will be done to address some of the discrepancies observed in the ‘as is’ process?

<--- Score

26. What lessons, if any, from a pilot were incorporated into the design of the full-scale solution?

<--- Score

27. How can we improve performance?

<--- Score

28. Does the goal represent a desired result that can be measured?

<--- Score

29. What communications are necessary to support the implementation of the solution?

<--- Score

30. What is the team’s contingency plan for potential problems occurring in implementation?

<--- Score

31. What tools were used to tap into the creativity and encourage ‘outside the box’ thinking?

<--- Score

32. What tools were used to evaluate the potential solutions?

<--- Score

33. Is there a high likelihood that any recommendations will achieve their intended results?

<--- Score

34. How can skill-level changes improve ISO IEC 17020?

<--- Score

35. At what point will vulnerability assessments be performed once ISO IEC 17020 is put into production (e.g., ongoing Risk Management after implementation)?

<--- Score

36. How does the team improve its work?

<--- Score

37. Is the optimal solution selected based on testing and analysis?

<--- Score

38. Is Supporting ISO IEC 17020 documentation required?

<--- Score

39. How do we go about Comparing ISO IEC 17020 approaches/solutions?

<--- Score

40. Who will be responsible for making the decisions to include or exclude requested changes once ISO IEC 17020 is underway?

<--- Score

41.

Download

Copyright Disclaimer:
This site does not store any files on its server. We only index and link to content provided by other sites. Please contact the content providers to delete copyright contents if any and email us, we'll remove relevant links or contents immediately.