Evaluation of the Congressionally Directed Medical Research Programs Review Process by unknow

Author:unknow
Language: eng
Format: epub
Tags: Health and Medicine: Health Sciences, Health and Medicine: Policy, Reviews and Evaluations
Publisher: The National Academies Press
Published: 2016-12-29T00:00:00+00:00

The committee finds these definitions of expertise and experience to be very helpful and likely to be quite informative in assigning applications for review. There does not appear to be a similar process at the National Institutes of Health (NIH).

The committee assumes that the SRO uses the reviewers’ responses to confirm their expertise and to assign primary, secondary, and specialty reviewers (if applicable). In general, only reviewers who have indicated high or medium expertise for an application are assigned to be primary or secondary reviewers for that application; the primary reviewer for any application must have high expertise (Salzer, 2016d). The peer review contractor also ensures that all reviewers on a panel have a minimum level of expertise.

Download

Copyright Disclaimer:
This site does not store any files on its server. We only index and link to content provided by other sites. Please contact the content providers to delete copyright contents if any and email us, we'll remove relevant links or contents immediately.