Our Bodies, Our Data: How Companies Make Billions Selling Our Medical Records by Adam Tanner

Author:Adam Tanner [Tanner, Adam]
Language: eng
Format: azw3
ISBN: 9780807033357
Publisher: Beacon Press
Published: 2017-01-09T16:00:00+00:00

Google Gives It a Try

The vision of an easily available, patient-controlled medical dossier remains stubbornly elusive, even for the world’s most successful tech companies. The ambitious goals that pioneers Larry Weed, Warner Slack, and others had begun decades before continues to elude all those who pick up the torch. With all of its brains and money, Google thought it could present patients with easy access their medical records from multiple providers in one central location. Google’s CEO Eric Schmidt described a scenario when he announced a medical record bank called Google Health in 2008: “If, God forbid, I were in the emergency room here in Florida, I’d want whoever is sitting there trying to keep me going to have access to the last N years of my radiological experiences, and I’d like them to have it instantaneously. And we can do that now.”4

Schmidt explained that Google Health would store data for patients, who could use it for everything from checking up on their vaccinations to providing access to doctors in an emergency. To help patients import data, Google signed up pharmacies (Walgreens, Duane Reade, Longs Drugs), test labs (Quest Diagnostics), middlemen (Allscripts), insurers (Aetna), and health-care providers (Cleveland Clinic, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center). It promised never to share data without the user’s permission, saying that profit could come from generating more business for other Google services. Schmidt noted that in 2008, there were two hundred US personal record systems, most linked to a specific company or health system. “Any scenario where information is sort of isolated is a scenario where health is not well delivered,” he said.

With past success in search, browsers, maps, and many other areas, it seemed that if anyone could succeed in attracting users, especially for a free service, it would be Google. “You sit there and say, ‘Well, this will never happen . . . five percent of people will adopt this stuff,’” he said. “That’s always true in year one. But in year ten, it is usually 70, 80 percent that have adopted it.”

Such bold pronouncements from Silicon Valley have often come true. But not so for medical dossiers. In 2011, Google gave up and closed the service. “Google Health is not having the broad impact that we hoped it would,” the company wrote in announcing its demise. “There has been adoption among certain groups of users like tech-savvy patients and their caregivers, and more recently fitness and wellness enthusiasts. But we haven’t found a way to translate that limited usage into widespread adoption in the daily health routines of millions of people.”5

Download

Copyright Disclaimer:
This site does not store any files on its server. We only index and link to content provided by other sites. Please contact the content providers to delete copyright contents if any and email us, we'll remove relevant links or contents immediately.