Did Darwin Get It Right? Essays on Games, Sex and Evolution [1988] by John Maynard Smith

Did Darwin Get It Right? Essays on Games, Sex and Evolution [1988] by John Maynard Smith

Author:John Maynard Smith [Smith, J. Maynard]
Language: eng
Format: epub
Publisher: Chapman & Hall
Published: 1988-09-30T04:00:00+00:00


In from the cold

This brings me to what I see as the greatest impact that palaeontology is having on the way we see the mechanisms of evolution. We have been familiar for a long time with the dramatic disappearance of the Dinosaurs at the end of the Cretaceous. It is now apparent that massive extinctions, involving many different taxa, have been a repeated feature {130} of evolution. Adolf Seilacher (Tubingen University) and Anthony Hallam (Birmingham University), the two palaeontologists on the panel, agreed with Gould on this, although there was disagreement about whether these events have been periodic or irregular, and whether they are caused by extraterrestrial events (meteorites, asteroids) or by terrestrial ones (Hallam, for example, emphasises the role of changes in the area of the continental shelf caused by continental drift - see Nature 308, 686; 1984). The impact of these extinctions is not random; in any given event, some taxa are more affected than others: Seilacher stressed the need for a quantitative study of this, to replace the somewhat anecdotal picture we now have.

In addition to the problem of their causation (which at present seems to be a problem for geologists and astronomers, although Seilacher did not rule out the possibility that some extinctions had biotic causes), these extinctions raise questions for evolutionary biologists. Is it possible that evolutionary change would slow down and stop in the absence of changes in the physical environment? As Manfred Eigen has pointed out, the simplest evolving systems (populations of RNA molecules in test tubes) reach a global optimum and then stop. Are extinctions, then, a necessary motive force of evolution? A second question concerns the relation between extinction and radiation. Ecologists tend to see nature as dominated by competition. They would therefore expect the extinction of one species, or group of species, to be caused by competition from another taxon. Most palaeontologists read the fossil record differently. The Dinosaurs, they believe, became extinct for reasons that had little to do with competition from the mammals. Only subsequently did the mammals, which had been around for as long as the Dinosaurs, radiate to fill the empty space. The same general pattern, they think, has held for other major taxonomic replacements. Not all palaeontologists would agree, but I think this is the majority view. I find it surprising: I would have expected a major cause of extinction to be competition from other taxa.

The Tanner lectures were an entertaining and stimulating occasion. The palaeontologists have too long been missing from the high table. Welcome back.



Download



Copyright Disclaimer:
This site does not store any files on its server. We only index and link to content provided by other sites. Please contact the content providers to delete copyright contents if any and email us, we'll remove relevant links or contents immediately.