Locality and Logophoricity by Isabelle Charnavel

Author:Isabelle Charnavel
Language: eng
Format: epub
Publisher: Oxford University Press
Published: 2019-03-09T16:00:00+00:00

68. See section 3.2.1.2.3 and Charnavel (2019a) for the hypothesis that (some) adjunct clauses (e.g., because-clause) in fact qualify as attitude contexts.

69. Based on the fact that taan shows the blocking effect, but not the de re blocking effect (see section 3.1.3), Anand (2006:155–156) tentatively analyzes Malayalam taan as a shifting indexical. But examples like (171) challenge this analysis, as well as further cases mentioned by Anand himself.

70. The Greek anaphor o idhios also exhibits anti-locality effects (see Iatridou’s (1986) Condition D, cf. Enç 1989). It could be worth checking whether it has logophoric properties. Another potential logophoric pronoun outside African languages could be French lui, which triggers antilogophoricity effects when clustered with other clitics both within and outside attitude contexts (see Charnavel & Mateu 2015).

71. The same does not hold of spatial prepositional expressions: son propre and lui-même anteceded by le fils de Géraldine (“Géraldine’s son”)—the attitude holder in (xxv)a and the empathy locus in (xxv)b—are exempt even if the use of à droite de (“to the right of” without definite article) forces a relative interpretation (i.e., the speaker, not the antecedent, is the deictic center).

Download

Copyright Disclaimer:
This site does not store any files on its server. We only index and link to content provided by other sites. Please contact the content providers to delete copyright contents if any and email us, we'll remove relevant links or contents immediately.