The Birth of Ontological Mathematics: The Origin of the Ultimate Intellectual Revolution by Tanner Jack

The Birth of Ontological Mathematics: The Origin of the Ultimate Intellectual Revolution by Tanner Jack

Author:Tanner, Jack [Tanner, Jack]
Language: eng
Format: epub
Published: 2020-11-20T00:00:00+00:00


Immanence and Transcendence

M atter atoms are strictly immanent. They exist only in space and time. That’s the entire problem with them. The mind-matter problem is in fact a transcendence-immanence problem, i.e. the fundamental substance of existence must be able to bridge two domains: non-spacetime (singularities) and spacetime (non-singularities). In ontological mathematics, all sinusoidal waves are fundamentally transcendent and reside within transcendent monadic minds. However, when all of these transcendent monads share sinusoidal content then, via the laws of ontological Fourier mathematics, they create a collective spacetime domain – an immanent domain. So, we now have a collective, objective, immanent domain (the same for all monads) interacting with individual transcendent agents (the autonomous monads), each of which experiences reality subjectively , from its own perspective. Isn’t that an exact description of our reality? It achieves everything immanent Atomism fails to.

Ontological mathematics completely explains the apparent mind-matter dualism we all experience, and does so via a sinusoidal monism. Atomic monism – which is strictly immanent and totally rejects transcendence – is absolutely incapable of explaining life, mind, subjectivity, free will, and so on.

The “beauty” of atomic monism is that it’s easy to model using simple mathematics tracking moving entities interacting with each other in a spacetime container. Sinusoidal mathematics, because it involves countless waves all existing in a Singularity, and organized in terms of countless monadic minds that can interact collectively, objectively and immanently, is vastly more complicated to model.

If you look deeply into quantum mechanics (a wavefunction system), you realize that it is all about both transcendent and immanent sinusoidal interactions. The whole reason why scientists cannot understand quantum mechanics is that they are bringing immanent, local, spacetime, materialist, empiricist thinking to a subject that demands taking into consideration an additional, wholly different domain, that of the transcendent, non-local, non-spacetime, immaterialist and rationalist.

If you leave out half of reality (the most important half), as materialist quantum physicists do, it of course becomes impossible to make any sense of the system, which is exactly why quantum physicists say, “Shut up and calculate” rather than make any attempt to understand what quantum mechanics is truly saying (it’s truly saying that immanent atomic materialism and empiricism is false and refuted).

The mathematics of quantum mechanics is all about transcendence and immanence, which is exactly why the mathematics works (it reflects reality), but the scientific materialist interpretation (misinterpretation) of the mathematics, trying to make it fit the immanent-only paradigm of scientism, is wholly and absurdly wrong, which is exactly why scientists insanely talk about “probability cats” – both alive and dead and in mixed alive-dead states until an observation is made – and claim that random quantum fluctuations in “non-existence” can create existence. Mad explanations follow on from having a mad and false model of reality, and refusing to change it once it has been definitively falsified.

Modern scientists are like the flat-earth and geocentric scientists of the past who simply refused to accept that their observational model of reality was totally false (their observations had deluded them).



Download



Copyright Disclaimer:
This site does not store any files on its server. We only index and link to content provided by other sites. Please contact the content providers to delete copyright contents if any and email us, we'll remove relevant links or contents immediately.